BMC NeurosciBMC Neuroscience1471-2202BioMed Central32402391471-2202-12-S1-P14410.1186/1471-2202-12-S1-P144Poster PresentationCorrelation transmission of spiking neurons is boosted by synchronous inputSchultze-KraftMatthias1schultze-kraft@tu-berlin.deDiesmannMarkus234GrünSonja45HeliasMoritz2Machine Learning Group, Berlin Institute of Technology, Berlin, GermanyLaboratory for Computational Neurophysics, RIKEN Brain Science Institute, Wako City, JapanBrain and Neural Systems Team, RIKEN Computational Science Research Program, Wako City, JapanInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-6), Computational and Systems Neuroscience, Research Center Jülich, GermanyLaboratory for Statistical Neuroscience, RIKEN Brain Science Institute, Wako City, Japan2011187201112Suppl 1Twentieth Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting: CNS*2011Jean-Marc Fellous and Astrid PrinzPublication of this supplement has been supported by Neuralynx, Springer, INCF and the Bernstein Network Computational Neurosciencehttp://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1471-2202-12-S1-info.pdfP144P144Copyright ©2011 Schultze-Kraft et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.2011Schultze-Kraft et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.23-28 July 2011Twentieth Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting: CNS*2011Stockholm, Sweden<p>Ever since the discovery of precisely timed events of cortical neurons [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>], their role for information processing has been highly debated. The widespread belief that synchrony is an epiphenomenon caused by shared afferents among neurons [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>] has constantly been challenged by reports observing task related modulation of synchrony, lately in primary visual cortex [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>] and motor cortex [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>]. More so, the recently found decorrelation in cortical networks [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>] suggests that the ground state of recurrent balanced networks provides a suitable substrate on top of which synchronized events can represent information.</p><p>In this work we theoretically investigate to what extent common synaptic afferents and synchronized inputs each contribute to closely time-locked spiking activity of pairs of neurons [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>]. We employ direct simulation and extend earlier analytical methods based on the diffusion approximation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>] to pulse-coupling, allowing us to introduce spiking correlations in the afferent synaptic activity. We compare situations in which the covariance in the input to a pair of model neurons is kept constant, but is realized by different proportions of common afferents and spiking synchrony. This allows us to address the question how much synchrony is caused by afferent synchronized events and how much is intrinsic to cortex due to its structure.</p><p>We find that at fixed input covariance, already weakly synchronous inputs boost the synchrony in the outgoing spiking activity compared to shared input alone (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1A</xref>), sharpening the correlation functions (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1B</xref>). In the regime of strong input synchrony we observe that the output correlation becomes even higher than the correlation in the input (cf. gray area in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1A</xref>). Recent theoretical insights [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>] into the non-linear response properties of neurons enable us to explain how such correlation transmission gain > 1 is possible.</p><p>Partially supported by BMBF Grant 01IB001A (brain@work), the Helmholtz Alliance on Systems Biology, the Next-Generation Supercomputer Project of MEXT, EU Grant 15879 (FACETS), EU Grant 269921 (BrainScaleS). All network simulations carried out with NEST (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.nest-initiative.org">http://www.nest-initiative.org</ext-link>).</p><fig id="F1" position="float"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p>Correlation transmission of a pair of model neurons. <bold>A</bold> Output correlation at 1 ms precision as a function of input correlation. Transmission for 10 per cent pairwise synchronous input spikes in black, no input synchrony in gray. The correlation gain exceeds unity in the gray shaded area. <bold>B</bold> Time-resolved correlation functions. Same gray code as in A.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="1471-2202-12-S1-P144-1"/></fig></sec></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation publication-type="other"><name><surname>Abeles</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><article-title>Local Cortical Circuits: An Electrophysiological Study</article-title><source>Springer, Berlin</source><year>1982</year></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Shadlen</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Newsome</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><source>J Neurosci</source><year>1998</year><volume>18</volume><issue>10</issue><fpage>3870</fpage><lpage>3896</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9570816</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Maldonado</surname><given-names>PEE</given-names></name><name><surname>Babul</surname><given-names>CMM</given-names></name><name><surname>Singer</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Rodriguez</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Berger</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Grün</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><source>J Neurophys</source><year>2008</year><volume>100</volume><fpage>1523</fpage><lpage>1532</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1152/jn.00076.2008</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Kilavik</surname><given-names>BE</given-names></name><name><surname>Roux</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Ponce-Alvarez</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Confais</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Grün</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Riehle</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><source>J Neurosci</source><year>2009</year><volume>29</volume><fpage>12653</fpage><lpage>12663</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1554-09.2009</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19812340</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Ecker</surname><given-names>AS</given-names></name><name><surname>Berens</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Keliris</surname><given-names>PA</given-names></name><name><surname>Bethge</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Logothetis</surname><given-names>NK</given-names></name><name><surname>Tolias</surname><given-names>AS</given-names></name><source>Science</source><year>2010</year><volume>327</volume><fpage>584</fpage><lpage>587</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1179867</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20110506</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Grün</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Diesmann</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Aertsen</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><source>Neural Comp</source><year>2002</year><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>43</fpage><lpage>80</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1162/089976602753284455</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>De La Rocha</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Doiron</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Shea-Brown</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Josic</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Reyes</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><source>Nature</source><year>2007</year><volume>448</volume><issue>7155</issue><fpage>802</fpage><lpage>806</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature06028</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17700699</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Helias</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Deger</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Rotter</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Diesmann</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><source>PLoS Comput Biol</source><year>2010</year><volume>6</volume><issue>9</issue><fpage>e1000929</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20856583</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000929</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>